Superman can be a tricky character to nail. Noble, handsome and omnipotent to the point of being near flawless, the character harks back to a time (1938, to be precise) when superheroes were the stuff of novelty and comic book readers would lap up pedestrian displays of superhuman strength and pompous monologues ripe with selfless heroism. But now we live in an age where lifting heavy objects no longer qualifies as pulse raising entertainment, with audiences liking their superheroes to be conflicted, prone to the occasional quip and, crucially, a bit more human. Like Batman, basically.

Man-of-Steel-Fan-poster-man-of-steel-34401239-901-1352

Man of Steel (2013)

Which makes Warner Bros’ decision to hire Christopher Nolan, hot off his acclaimed Dark Knight trilogy, as a producer to shepherd Man of Steel into the 21st century entirely logical (despite being released in 2006, Bryan Singer’s maligned Superman Returns shared its DNA with the Donner/Reeve flicks from the late 70s, early 80s). Zack Snyder taking the director’s chair also made sense, as he’s had his fair share of experience handling comic book properties like 300 and Watchmen. Throw in a heavyweight cast of Oscar-nominees and you’re onto what Hollywood execs like to call “a sure thing”.

However, anyone who has learnt not to be fooled by a film’s line-up and marketing campaign will know better than to walk into Man of Steel thinking that, like its central hero, it’s going to be bulletproof. In fact, the movie does come with its fair share of flaws, some of which prove more detrimental than others.

The most glaring one that comes to mind is that, in a clear attempt to emulate Nolan’s success with the Batman franchise, MOS strips the character of all Golden Age nostalgia and emerges instead as, yes, a much darker and grittier film, with Superman even sinking among a sea of human skulls at one point. That’s not to say we should get a 2 hour film of Clark Kent picking daisies, but in terms and style and tone it is a bit of a departure from the source material. The similarities to Batman Begins are further accentuated by the film’s re-shuffled narrative structure, as we bounce back and forth between Clark’s troubled childhood and his present day quandaries.

Another serious issue with the film is pace. Given Kal-El’s (the official name on Supes’ birth certificate) otherworldly origins, a sizeable chunk of the running time is spent on clunky exposition on Kryptonian history, politics and technology. Clearly this is screenwriter David S. Goyer’s way of showing he’s committed to the Superman mythology, but surely he could’ve skimped on some of the details. And to those of you who thought that Transformers didn’t know when to end an action scene, you might want to bring a stopwatch and some ear plugs, ‘cause it seems like Zack Snyder is out to prove he can direct the longest, LOUDEST and most bombastic set-piece we’ve seen in a blockbuster for a while (seriously, never has so much abuse been inflicted on a metropolitan skyline). You might think it looks brilliant on paper, but the end result is surprisingly exhausting to watch. Perhaps these were the moments where Nolan’s sensibilities as a director would’ve come in handy and Snyder could’ve been reined in a bit more.

But despite its shortcomings, there are elements of brilliance in Man of Steel that are worthy of mention, such as Hans Zimmer’s epic score that bring the flight sequences to vibrant life, or the genius casting of Russell Crowe and Kevin Costner as the hero’s father figures. But the aspect of the character that is handled the best is the humans’ reaction to Superman’s existence. In the original Richard Donner film Lois Lane didn’t bat an eyelid when he revealed he was from another planet. In MOS, the world is understandably shaken by the sudden realization that a humanoid alien with godlike powers is walking among them, their wariness and paranoia completely justified. Superman’s relationship with Lois also gets an interesting retooling, the two sharing a delicate and believable trust before any romance blossoms.

As for the big blue boy scout himself, Henry Cavill turns in a likeable, if uneven performance. He pulls off the look effortlessly and gets to show range in a couple of scenes, but lacks the innate charisma that Christopher Reeve displayed in his first outing back in 1978, not to mention the experience of a leading actor. Nevertheless, there’s enough work on display to suggest that, should he be back for a sequel (and early box office reports seem to indicate just that), he will grow into his star-making role.

As a device to repackage DC’s oldest superhero property and mainstream him into the 21st century, Man of Steel is a success. As a fully-rounded film in its own right, it is undeniably flawed. You could say that what we’re left with is not the Superman film we deserve, but the one we need right now. So here’s a challenge, Warner Bros: how about trying to make a sequel that is actually lighter than the origin story?

Man of Steel (2013) directed by Zack Snyder

Tagged with:
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.